Clockwise Alternatives in 2026: What to Use Instead
Clockwise shut down on March 27, 2026 — Salesforce acquihired the team for Agentforce and discontinued the product with about a week’s notice (full story and migration guide here). Clockwise optimized meeting times across your team to protect focus blocks, and it was genuinely good at that job. Now that it’s gone, here’s what to use instead.
Why People Look for Clockwise Alternatives
- It shut down — the service was turned off on March 27, 2026 and user data was deleted. There’s no successor product on the Salesforce side, so every Clockwise user needs a replacement.
- It was Google Calendar only — Clockwise never supported Outlook, so many teams were already looking for something that covered Microsoft 365.
- It needed team adoption — Clockwise’s meeting optimization only worked when everyone it was scheduling used it, which pushed individuals toward individual-first tools like Reclaim.
Best Clockwise Alternatives
Reclaim AI — Best for Individuals
What it does: Auto-schedules tasks, habits, and focus blocks around your meetings. Defends your deep work time from meeting creep.
Why it’s better than Clockwise for individuals: Clockwise was team-first. Reclaim is individual-first — it gives you personal control over your time with or without team adoption. You get habit scheduling (exercise, lunch, deep work), task auto-scheduling from Todoist/Asana/ClickUp, and smart meeting scheduling. Unlike Clockwise, it supports both Google Calendar and Outlook (Outlook support shipped August 2025).
Limitation: Reclaim was acquired by Dropbox in 2024 — it’s still open for signups and actively developed, but factor in the acquisition history if platform risk burned you with Clockwise.
Pricing: Free Lite plan; Pro from $8/user/month.
Motion — Best for Project + Calendar Integration
What it does: Combines calendar, tasks, and project planning. Automatically schedules everything based on priorities and deadlines.
Why it’s a Clockwise alternative: Motion goes further than Clockwise did — not just optimizing meeting times but building your entire workday schedule automatically. More powerful, more opinionated.
Limitation: Steep learning curve. Many users find initial setup overwhelming.
Pricing: From $19/user/month (individual); $12/user/month (team, annual).
Carly — Best for Reducing Scheduling Overhead
What it does: AI scheduling assistant that handles meeting coordination via email and chat — checking availability, proposing times, creating invites.
Why it’s a Clockwise alternative: Clockwise optimized when meetings happened; Carly reduces the work of scheduling them in the first place. If the problem is scheduling back-and-forth rather than meeting density, Carly is a better fit. It also includes free booking pages for external-facing scheduling.
Works with: Google Calendar and Outlook.
Pricing: Free tier available.
Cal.com (open source) — Best for Scheduling Links
What it does: Open-source scheduling infrastructure with team availability, round-robin routing, and full customization.
Why it’s a Clockwise alternative: If you need team scheduling pages (rather than calendar optimization), Cal.com provides that — open-source, self-hostable, no per-user fees.
Pricing: Free (self-hosted); hosted plans available.
SavvyCal — Best for Smart Scheduling Links
What it does: Scheduling links where recipients overlay their own calendar to visually find mutual availability. Feels more collaborative than standard Calendly-style links.
Why it’s a Clockwise alternative: For teams whose main problem is coordinating external meetings (with clients, candidates, partners), SavvyCal handles it without requiring internal adoption.
Pricing: Free trial; from $12/month.
Calendly (Teams) — Most Widely Recognized
What it does: The original scheduling link tool, now with team features including round-robin routing and collective availability.
Why it’s a Clockwise alternative: For client-facing scheduling at scale, Calendly’s integrations and brand recognition make it the default choice.
Limitation: Less useful for internal optimization; doesn’t help with focus time protection.
Pricing: Free (basic); Teams from $16/user/month.
Clockwise vs. Reclaim vs. Motion: Quick Comparison
| Clockwise (shut down) | Reclaim | Motion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Still available | No — shut down Mar 27, 2026 | Yes | Yes |
| Focus time protection | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Outlook | No | Yes (since Aug 2025) | Yes |
| Task scheduling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Requires team adoption | Yes (for full value) | No | No |
| Best for | — | Individuals | Power users |
| Free tier | — | Yes | No |
Which Replacement Fits Which Clockwise Habit
Waiting Clockwise out isn’t an option — the product is gone and the data was deleted. If you mainly used the focus blocks, Reclaim is the most direct migration. If you want tasks and calendar auto-planned together, Motion goes further than Clockwise ever did. And if the real goal was less scheduling work overall, Carly handles the coordination itself. For a feature-by-feature migration map, see Clockwise shut down: how to replace every feature.
More: Clockwise shut down — migration guide · Best AI calendar assistants · Reclaim alternatives · Motion alternatives
Ready to automate your busywork?
Carly schedules, researches, and briefs you—so you can focus on what matters.
See what people say
"Before Carly, I relied on a Calendly link, but the whole process felt impersonal and not very professional. Carly changed that by handling all the back-and-forth, so I'm no longer stuck in endless email threads trying to line up schedules.
Now Carly reaches out to candidates, shares my real-time availability, lets them pick a slot, then sends a Zoom link and drops it straight into my calendar. She sends reminders to both of us before each call, which has significantly reduced no-shows and last-minute confusion.
On top of scheduling, Carly acts like a full executive assistant, sending me my schedule the night before so I can prepare for each call. It reminds me of the old x.ai assistant, but Carly is noticeably smarter, faster, and better suited to my healthcare recruitment business."
